Crash-TechnologyAutomobile manufacturers place a major emphasis on advertising the safety features of each of their vehicles. However, it is important for consumers to understand that not all of these features will actually increase their odds of surviving a crash. In fact, some of the so-called crash technology actually provides little to no assistance during a traffic accident. Therefore, each consumer needs to take the time to carefully analyze all of their safety option choices before they commit to their next vehicle.

One feature that many new cars have is a rear view camera. One Charleston car accident attorney states that "Approximately 50 backup injuries involving a child will happen each week across the country", which makes this a lifesaving addition. But even with this type of technology, drivers should be diligent as cameras can sometimes fail. While new innovations an be helpful, technology is not foolproof.

Does Crash Avoidance Technology Really Work?

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), crash avoidance technology systems have had a noticeable impact on the number of accidents that happen each year. Unfortunately, these systems are extremely cost prohibitive, and can add at least $1,000 to the price of a new vehicle. Due to this, it is not a wise idea for consumers to simply look for a vehicle that offers this option because not all of them work as well as expected.

How do I know Which Crash Avoidance Technology to Purchase?

The IIHS has tested the majority of vehicles available in the market today that have the option to add on crash avoidance technology. Each of these vehicles was given a rating of Basic, Advanced or Superior to help consumers identify whether or not it makes good financial sense to add crash avoidance technology onto their new vehicle purchase. The results of this test indicated that many of these safety systems do not work as well as consumers would expect. For example, the initial test looked at the reaction time of 74 different vehicles that encountered a potential crash at 25 mph.

The purpose of crash avoidance technology is to engage the brakes so that you do not end up in a traffic accident. Unfortunately, only the Outback and Subaru Legacy were able to completely avoid getting into a collision. When you consider the fact that many accidents will occur at a speed that is much higher than 25 mph, it becomes easy to see that crash avoidance technology still has a long way to go.

Are Advanced Models Worth the Price?

Although only two vehicles obtained the Superior rating, there were several automobiles that fell into the Advanced category. Of these options, the Volvo models are perhaps the best choice because their auto-braking system is less expensive than every other vehicle in this category. In other words, you can still obtain some crash protection without needing to spend more than $1,000.

Which Vehicles Should I Avoid?

Many of the automobiles that were given the Basic rating do not include automatic braking technology. However, there were a few vehicles in this class that have this technology, and they seriously under performed. Because of this, it is best to steer clear of the Toyota Prius V and the Infinity JX35, also known as the QX60, if you are in the market for a vehicle that allows you to add on crash avoidance technology.

Although this technology does not currently work as well as most people would expect, it is highly likely that improvements will continue to be made. In the meantime, drivers need to be aware of the steps that they should take if they are involved in an accident. For example, you are driving through the Charleston area and someone crashes into your vehicle, you should contact a car accident attorney to help you recover all of your applicable vehicle and medical expenses.

After reading the blog post of Charleston car accident attorney, Howell and Christmas, and learning of a girl who was killed when a relative backed over him, writer Melanie Fleury began to wonder if technology has helped to prevent incidents like this.